Cacheon Team Discusses Emission Strategy and Compensation Adjustments

The team debated risks of emission burning and proposed dynamic compensation ratios for top performers. They acknowledged potential delays in product-market fit if miner rewards become uncompetitive, emphasizing the need to balance validator incentives.

• •Proposed dynamic compensation split for King vs. Runner-up based on performance gaps
• •Warned emission burning could trigger validator liquidations if mining becomes unprofitable
• •Suggested alternatives to fixed 80/20 reward distribution to maintain leader motivation
• •Highlighted 4-6 month timeline for stable revenue from Chutes