SN17 Recalibrating Judge After Three Rounds
Share
The subnet is addressing code similarity and judge subjectivity issues by recalibrating the judging system using empirical data from the first three rounds of results. The team is shifting focus toward outcome-based evaluation rather than source code review, and adding consistency as part of the incentive structure to improve solution stability.
- •Judge recalibration underway using three rounds of empirical data
- •Consistency now part of incentive mechanism
- •Outcome-based evaluation prioritized over source code review
Distilled from 3 team messages in the official Bittensor Discord. Generated by Claude Haiku 4.5.