Validator scoring inconsistencies plague CliqueAI subnet

Developer evidence shows CliqueAI validators are rewarding miners for finding larger cliques than actually exist in the encoded graphs sent to miners. Local verification confirms miner submissions are valid and maximal cliques, yet validators score them zero while other miners receive rewards for the same graph size. Concurrent discussion reveals broader governance concerns: registration fees and miner selection remain unchanged despite community pushback, with one community member requesting subnet burn if the owner doesn't address burn-policy violations.

• •Validator leaderboards show 76-cliques where encoded matrix maximum is 75
• •Miner UID 229 consistently returns valid maximal cliques, receives zero rewards
• •Registration fee adjustment promised but not yet implemented
• •Community demands fee reduction and lower miner cap or subnet burn