Validator scoring inconsistencies plague CliqueAI subnet
Share
Developer evidence shows CliqueAI validators are rewarding miners for finding larger cliques than actually exist in the encoded graphs sent to miners. Local verification confirms miner submissions are valid and maximal cliques, yet validators score them zero while other miners receive rewards for the same graph size. Concurrent discussion reveals broader governance concerns: registration fees and miner selection remain unchanged despite community pushback, with one community member requesting subnet burn if the owner doesn't address burn-policy violations.
- •Validator leaderboards show 76-cliques where encoded matrix maximum is 75
- •Miner UID 229 consistently returns valid maximal cliques, receives zero rewards
- •Registration fee adjustment promised but not yet implemented
- •Community demands fee reduction and lower miner cap or subnet burn
Distilled from 17 team messages in the official Bittensor Discord. Generated by Claude Haiku 4.5.
View original messages
- Discord message 1503604669820174437
- Discord message 1503605202656297111
- Discord message 1503606119954645073
- Discord message 1503606705496522782
- Discord message 1503607450270699520
- Discord message 1503607625277771796
- Discord message 1503608381921955881
- Discord message 1503608720410808360
- Discord message 1503609068319936592
- Discord message 1503609362134994995
- Discord message 1503636760104800307
- Discord message 1503730049231360020
- Discord message 1503742235806531717
- Discord message 1503743654936973435